Lonegecker's more full response on Meggitt's model qualifies as my quote of the day:
One gets the sense that, in order to prove that all urban-Jesus followers lived in squalid conditions, Meggitt first must excuse himself for taking liberties in his reconstruction of economic realities of the ancient world, not least with his claim that everyone except 1% lived in squalid conditions. If widespread and notable data need to be swept under the carpet in order to prove a thesis, it might be better to sweep the thesis under the carpet instead (43; italics mine).
This is good criticism for all of those to take heed when presenting any thesis of any kind. We cannot, nor should not ignore all the available evidence, making the evidence a slave to the thesis instead of the other way around.
No comments:
Post a Comment